Short Courses of the IHC 2024
Keywords:
Accessibility, Social Media, Visual Impairment, Speculative Design, Technology, Ethics, Social Inclusion, Evaluation, Usability, User Experience, Virtual Reality, Augmented RealitySynopsis
The book "Minicursos IHC 2024 - Fundamentos e Práticas para Experiências Digitais Acessíveis, Inclusivas e Eticamente Responsáveis" (IHC 2024 Mini-courses - Fundamentals and Practices for Accessible, Inclusive, and Ethically Responsible Digital Experiences) is part of the series "Perspectivas e Práticas Contemporâneas em IHC" (Contemporary Perspectives and Practices in HCI). It addresses topics related to Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) practices. The proposals submitted to IHC 2024 were evaluated by at least two reviewers from the HCI community in Brazil and abroad. The selection of proposals considered the scores assigned by the reviewers, the topics covered, and the event's schedule availability, aiming to provide the community with diverse themes in the mini-courses offered. Four proposals were accepted, mini-courses were delivered at the event, three of which have been expanded into chapters in this book.
In the first chapter, entitled "Acessibilidade nas Mídias Sociais para Pessoas com Deficiência Visual" (Accessibility on Social Media for People with Visual Impairments), the authors address aspects of accessibility for people with disabilities, presenting practical examples. The text presents a solid foundation and describes processes from planning to ways to describe images for publication in an accessible way for people with disabilities on social networks.
In the second chapter, "Design Especulativo: Construindo Pontes entre Tecnologia, Ética e Inclusão Social" (Speculative Design: Building Bridges between Technology, Ethics, and Social Inclusion), the authors present us with dynamic content, with a solid foundation and practice for using Speculative Design as a tool to reimagine the world from an ethical and inclusive perspective.
The third and final chapter, entitled "Avaliação da Usabilidade e da Experiência do Usuário em Realidade Virtual e Aumentada" (Evaluating Usability and User Experience in Virtual and Augmented Reality), presents fundamental concepts and practices to promote immersive user experiences considering challenges and care in conducting studies with people using virtual reality tools.
The three chapters in this book present methodologies and tools relevant to the field of Human-Computer Interaction, but their applications extend beyond this context. This work is helpful for individuals with varying backgrounds, whether from academia (researchers, students, or professors) or industry (UX professionals, marketers, designers, etc.) and is valuable for beginners and those with prior experience.
Chapters
-
1. Accessibility on Social Media for People with Visual Impairments
-
2. Speculative Design: Building Bridges between Technology, Ethics, and Social Inclusion
-
3. Evaluating Usability and User Experience in Virtual and Augmented Reality
Downloads
References
ABNT. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. (2016) ABNT NBR 16452: acessibilidade na comunicação - audiodescrição. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT. Disponível em: [link].
Akrich, M. (2014). Como descrever os objetos técnicos. Boletim Campineiro de Geografia, 4(1):161–182.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., and MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6):34–47.
Bai, Z. and Blackwell, A. F. (2012). Analytic review of usability evaluation in ISMAR. Interacting with Computers, 24(6):450–460.
Barbosa, S., Silva, B., Silveira, M., Gasparini, I., Darin, T., and Barbosa, G. (2021). Interação Humano-Computador e Experiência do Usuário. Autopublicação, Rio de Janeiro, 1a ed. edition.
Bardzell, J. and Bardzell, S. (2013). What is"critical"about critical design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 3297–3306.
Basdogan, C., Sedef, M., Harders, M., and Wesarg, S. (2007). VR-based simulators for training in minimally invasive surgery. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 27(2):54–66.
Berkman, M. I. and Akan, E. (2019). Presence and Immersion in Virtual Reality. In Lee, N., editor, Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games, pages 1–10. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Blauvelt, A. (2019). Defuturing the image of the future. Designs for Different Futures, Walker Art Center, pages 41–47.
Blok, A. and Jensen, C. B. (2019). The anthropocene event in social theory: On ways of problematizing nonhuman materiality differently. The Sociological Review, 67(6):1195–1211.
Boroon, L., Abedin, B., and Erfani, E. (2021). The dark side of using online social networks: A review of individuals’ negative experiences. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 29(6):1–21.
Bos, J. (2017). Motion Perception and Sickness, EyeMovements and Human Performance.
Brasil. Governo Digital. (2024) “Acessibilidade Digital”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2023a) “Pessoas com deficiência têm menor acesso à educação, ao trabalho e à renda”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2023b) “Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de domicílios Contínua: Acesso à Internet e à televisão e posse de telefone móvel celular para uso pessoal 2023”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Instituto Benjamin Constant. (2022) “O Sistema Braille”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. (2002) “Projeto DosVox”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Brasil. Ministério da Gestão e da Inovação em Serviços Públicos. Secretaria de Governo Digital. (2023a) “Guia de Boas Práticas para Acessibilidade Digital: Programa de Cooperação entre Reino Unido e Brasil em Acesso Digital”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Brasil. Presidência da República. (2004) "Decreto no 5.296, de 2 de dezembro de 2004. Regulamenta as Leis nº 10.048, de 8 de novembro de 2000, que dá prioridade de atendimento às pessoas que especifica [...]". Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Brasil. Presidência da República. (2015) "Lei no 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015. Institui a Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência (Estatuto da Pessoa com Deficiência)". Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Brasil. Presidência da República. (2021) "Lei no 14.126, de 22 de março de 2021. Classifica a visão monocular como deficiência sensorial, do tipo visual". Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Bray, K. E., Harrington, C., Parker, A. G., Diakhate, N., and Roberts, J. (2022). Radical futures: Supporting community-led design engagements through an afrofuturist speculative design toolkit. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–13.
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A ’Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale. In Usability Evaluation In Industry, pages 207–212. CRC Press, London, 1st edition.
Brown, E. and Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion. In CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’04, pages 1297–1300, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Burdea, G. and Coiffet, P. (2024). Virtual reality technology. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, third edition edition.
Calleja, G. (2011). In-game: from immersion to incorporation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Campos, T., Damasceno, E., and Valentim, N. (2024). Usability and User Experience Questionnaire Evaluation and Evolution for Touchable Holography. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pages 449–460, Angers, France. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications.
Campos, T., Valentim, N., and Damasceno, E. (2023). A Systematic Mapping Study on Usability and User Experience Evaluation of Touchable Holograms: Technical Report. Technical report, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Candy, S. and Dunagan, J. (2017). Designing an experiential scenario: The people who vanished. Futures, 86:136–153.
Celi, M. and Colombi, C. (2020). Trends as future prompts in the anticipatory design practice. Futures, 121:102564.
Cerqueira, J. B., Ferreira, E. M. B. (2000) “Recursos didáticos na educação especial”. Revista Benjamin Constant, n.15.
Cheiran, J. F., Pimenta, M., and Bandeira, D. (2022). Criação e Avaliação Preliminar de um Questionário Padronizado para Aferir Experiência de Usuário em Realidade Virtual imersiva. Comunicações em Informática, 6(2):5–8.
Chen, J. and Mokmin, N. A. M. (2024). Enhancing primary school students’ performance, flow state, and cognitive load in visual arts education through the integration of augmented reality technology in a card game. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12):15441–15461.
Chivukula, S. S., Li, Z., Pivonka, A. C., Chen, J., and Gray, C. M. (2021). Surveying the landscape of ethics-focused design methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.08909.
Ciliberti, E. C., Fiore, M., and Mongiello, M. (2023). Development of a Metaverse Platform for Tourism Promotion in Apulia. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Metaverse Computing, Networking and Applications (MetaCom), pages 680–681.
Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I. A. C., Raya, M. A., and Riva, G. (2018). The Past, Present, and Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality Research: A Network and Cluster Analysis of the Literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
Cummings, J. J. and Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychology, 19(2):272–309.
Derby, J. L. and Chaparro, B. S. (2021). The Challenges of Evaluating the Usability of Augmented Reality (AR). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 65(1):994–998.
Domingues, C. dos A. , Carvalho, S. H. R. and Arruda, S. M. C. P. (2010). "Alunos com baixa visão". Ministério da Educação, p. 8–25.
Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.
Dünser, A. and Billinghurst, M. (2011). Evaluating Augmented Reality Systems. In Furht, B., editor, Handbook of Augmented Reality, pages 289–307. Springer New York, New York, NY.
Dünser, A., Grasset, R., and Billinghurst, M. (2008). A survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies. In ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 courses on - SIGGRAPH Asia ’08, pages 1–27, Singapore. ACM Press.
Edwards, F. and Pettersen, I. N. (2023). Speculative design for envisioning more-than-human futures in desirable counter-cities. Cities, 142:104553.
Elliman, J., Loizou, M., and Loizides, F. (2016). Virtual Reality Simulation Training for Student Nurse Education. In 2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), pages 1–2.
Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. The MIT Press, 2 edition.
Fink, L. (2021). The philosopher’s corner: The role of theory in information systems research. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 52(3):96–103.
Frata Furlan Peres, F., Nunes, F., Teixeira, J. M., Maurício, C. R. M., Conceição, K. P., and Yoshida, L. (2024). Methods for Evaluating Immersive 3D Virtual Environments: a Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality, SVR ’24, pages 140–151, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Fu, Z. and Zhu, L. (2020). Envisioning the future scenario through design fiction generating toolkits. In Cross-Cultural Design. User Experience of Products, Services, and Intelligent Environments: 12th International Conference, CCD 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 22, pages 46–59. Springer.
Gianaros, P. J., Muth, E. R., Mordkoff, J. T., Levine, M. E., and Stern, R. M. (2001). A Questionnaire for the Assessment of the Multiple Dimensions of motion Sickness. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 72(2):115–119.
Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Hancock, P. A. and Meshkati, N., editors, Advances in Psychology, volume 52 of Human Mental Workload, pages 139–183. North-Holland, Amsterdan, Netherlands.
Hartson, R. and Pyla, P. (2012). The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann, 1st edition.
Hassenzahl, M. (2011). User Experience and Experience Design. In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design Fundation, online, 2nd edition.
Hauser, S., Oogjes, D., Wakkary, R., and Verbeek, P.-P. (2018). An annotated portfolio on doing postphenomenology through research products. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference, pages 459–471.
Havard, V., Baudry, D., Jeanne, B., Louis, A., and Savatier, X. (2021). A use case study comparing augmented reality (AR) and electronic documentbased maintenance instructions considering tasks complexity and operator competency level. Virtual Reality, 25(4):999–1014.
Ihde, D. (1990). The Indiana series in the philosophy of technology. Indiana University Press.
im kolophon: milton keynes: lightning source, 2010 edition.
ISO (2018). ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO (2019). ISO 9241-210:2019 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO/IEC. International Organization for Standardization. (2019) “ISO/IEC 20071-11:2019: Information technology - user interface component accessibility - part 11: guidance on text alternatives for images”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Ivory, M. Y. and Hearst, M. A. (2001). The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 33(4):470–516.
Jha, C. K., Shukla, Y., Mukherjee, R., Rathva, P., Joshi, M., and Jain, D. (2024). A Glove-Based Virtual Hand Rehabilitation System for Patients With Post-Traumatic Hand Injuries. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 71(7):2033–2041.
Johannessen, L. K., Keitsch, M. M., and Pettersen, I. N. (2019). Speculative and critical design—features, methods, and practices. In Proceedings of the design society: international conference on engineering design, volume 1, pages 1623–1632. Cambridge University Press.
Kalawsky, R. S. (1999). VRUSE—a computerised diagnostic tool: for usability evaluation of virtual/synthetic environment systems. Applied Ergonomics, 30(1):11–25.
Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., and Lilienthal, M. G. (1993). Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3):203–220.
Latour, B. et al. (1992). Where are the missing masses? the sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 1:225–258.
Laugwitz, B., Held, T., and Schrepp, M. (2008). Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. In Holzinger, A., editor, HCI and Usability for Education and Work, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 63–76, Graz, Austria. Springer.
Li, C.-R., Chang, Y.-J., Lin, M.-S., and Tsou, H.-K. (2024). Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: A Case Study of Atlantoaxial Instrumentation in Os Odontoideum. Medicina, 60(6):874.
Lindley, J. (2016). A Pragmatics Framework for Design Fiction. In 11th EAD Conference Proceedings: The Value of Design Research. Sheffield Hallam University.
Lindley, J., Sharma, D., and Potts, R. (2014). Anticipatory ethnography: Design fiction as an input to design ethnography. In Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, volume 2014, pages 237–253.Wiley Online Library.
Loutfi, M. S. and Siqueira, S. W. M. (2024). Speculative design in a graduate program in informatics: Students perception and practical application: A novel approach for supporting information systems education. In Proceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, pages 1–10.
Lu, M., Arikawa, M., Oba, K., Ishikawa, K., Jin, Y., Utsumi, T., and Sato, R. (2024). Indoor AR Navigation Framework Based on Geofencing and Image-Tracking with Accumulated Error Correction. Applied Sciences, 14(10):4262.
Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability interface, 8(2):3–6.
Malik, M. and Malik, M. M. (2021). Critical technical awakenings. Journal of Social Computing, 2(4):365–384.
Merino, L., Schwarzl, M., Kraus, M., Sedlmair, M., Schmalstieg, D., andWeiskopf, D. (2020). Evaluating Mixed and Augmented Reality: A Systematic Literature Review (2009-2019). In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pages 438–451, Porto de Galinhas, Brazil. IEEE.
Meta. (2024) “Central de Ajuda para Empresas: Sobre os Stories”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Milgram, P. and Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12):1321–1329. Publisher: The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers.
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., and Kishino, F. (1995). Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, volume 2351, pages 282–292. SPIE.
Min, X., Zhang,W., Sun, S., Zhao, N., Tang, S., and Zhuang, Y. (2019). VPModel: High-Fidelity Product Simulation in a Virtual-Physical Environment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(11):3083–3093.
Mitrović, I., Auger, J., Hanna, J., and Helgason, I. (2021). Beyond speculative design: past–present–future. SpeculativeEdu; Arts Academy, University of Split Split.
Motta, L. M. V. M., Romeu Filho, P. (2010). Audiodescrição: transformando imagens em palavras. São Paulo: Secretaria dos Direitos da Pessoa com Deficiência do Estado de São Paulo.
Mozuni, M. and Jonas, W. (2017). An introduction to the morphological delphi method for design: A tool for future-oriented design research. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(4):303–318.
Munn, L. (2023). The uselessness of ai ethics. AI and Ethics, 3(3):869–877.
Murphy, D. and Skarbez, R. (2022). What Do We Mean When We Say “Presence”? PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality, pages 171–190.
Murray, J. (1998). Hamlet on the Holodeck. The MIT Press.
MWPT. Movimento Web para Todos. (2024) “Boas práticas de acessibilidade digital”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Nardi, C. C. S. (2021). “Diretrizes para produção de alternativas ao conteúdo visual em mídias sociais online sob a perspectiva de pessoas com deficiência visual”. Programa de Pós-graduação em Informática da Unirio: Tese de doutorado. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to Usability.
Nunes, B. (2002). Heidegger & Ser e tempo. Editora Schwarcz-Companhia das Letras.
Nunes, S., Lomônaco, J. F. B. (2010). “O aluno cego: preconceitos e potencialidades”. Psicologia Escolar E Educacional, 14(1), 55–64. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-85572010000100006. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Ollenburg, S. (2018). Beyond futures: Designing futures by educating future designers. World Futures Review, 10(4):279–293.
Ollenburg, S. A. (2019). A futures-design-process model for participatory futures. Journal of futures studies, 23(4):51–62.
Parveau, M. and Adda, M. (2018). 3iVClass: a new classification method for Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Realities. Procedia Computer Science, 141:263–270.
Pereira, M. F., Prahm, C., Kolbenschlag, J., Oliveira, E., and Rodrigues, N. F. (2020). A Virtual Reality Serious Game for Hand Rehabilitation Therapy. In 2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), pages 1–7. ISSN: 2573-3060.
Prado De Campos, T., Damasceno, E. F., and Valentim, N. M. C. (2024). Evaluating Usability and UX in Touchable Holographic Solutions: A Validation Study of the UUXE-ToH Questionnaire. International Journal of Human– Computer Interaction, pages 1–21.
Pranoto, H., Tho, C., Warnars, H. L. H. S., Abdurachman, E., Gaol, F. L., and Soewito, B. (2017). Usability testing method in augmented reality application. In 2017 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), pages 181–186.
R, V., P, S., and MSR, R. (2023). Architectural Visualisation using Virtual Reality. In 2023 8th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), pages 1609–1615.
Rauschnabel, P. A., Felix, R., Hinsch, C., Shahab, H., and Alt, F. (2022). What is XR? Towards a Framework for Augmented and Virtual Reality. Computers in Human Behavior, 133:107289.
Rhiu, I., Kim, Y. M., Kim, W., and Yun, M. H. (2020). The evaluation of user experience of a human walking and a driving simulation in the virtual reality. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 79:103002.
Roto, V., Obrist, M., and Väänänen-vainio mattila, K. (2009). User Experience Evaluation Methods in Academic and Industrial Contexts. In Proceedings of the Workshop UXEM’09, volume II, page 4 p, Uppsala, Sweden. Springer.
Rubin, J. and Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, IN, 2nd edition.
Ryan, M.-L. (2010). Narrative as virtual reality: immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Parallax. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md., transferred to digital print. 2001
Sacramento, C., Leal Ferreira, S. B. (2022) “Accessibility on social media: exploring congenital blind people's interaction with visual content”. Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC 2022), DOI: 10.1145/3554364.3559140. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024
Sahin, N. T., Abdus-Sabur, R., Keshav, N. U., Liu, R., Salisbury, J. P., and Vahabzadeh, A. (2018). Case Study of a Digital Augmented Reality Intervention for Autism in School Classrooms: Associated With Improved Social Communication, Cognition, and Motivation via Educator and Parent Assessment. Frontiers in Education, 3.
SAMJI, S. and KAPOOR, M. (2022). Funda wande through the lens of pdia: Improving educational outcomes via flexibility, iteration, and learning. HARVARD Kennedy School - Building State Capability.
Santos, M. E. C., Taketomi, T., Sandor, C., Polvi, J., Yamamoto, G., and Kato, H. (2014). A usability scale for handheld augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST ’14, pages 167–176, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Satkowski, M., Büschel, W., and Dachselt, R. (2021). Experiences with User Studies in Augmented Reality. arXiv:2104.03795 [cs].
Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., and Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3):266–281.
Sharples, S., Cobb, S., Moody, A., andWilson, J. R. (2008). Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays, 29(2):58–69.
Singh, M., Bangay, S., Grossek, H., and Sajjanhar, A. (2023). Forest Classroom: A Case Study of Educational Augmented Reality Design to Facilitate Classroom Engagement. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(5):46.
Skarbez, R., Brooks, F. P., and Whitton, M. C. (2021a). Immersion and Coherence: Research Agenda and Early Results. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(10):3839–3850.
Skarbez, R., Brooks, Jr., F. P., and Whitton, M. C. (2017). A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(6):96:1–96:39.
Skarbez, R., Smith, M., and Whitton, M. C. (2021b). Revisiting Milgram and Kishino’s Reality-Virality Continuum. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2:647997.
Skarbez, R., Smith, M., Sadagic, A., and Whitton, M. C., editors (2022). Presence and Beyond: Evaluating User Experience in AR/MR/VR. Frontiers Research Topics. Frontiers Media SA.
Slater, M. (1999). Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(5):560–565.
Slater, M. and Wilbur, S. (1997). A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6):603–616.
Slater, M., Usoh, M., and Steed, A. (1994). Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 3(2):130–144.
Spadoni, E., Porro, S., Bordegoni, M., Arosio, I., Barbalini, L., and Carulli, M. (2022). Augmented Reality to Engage Visitors of Science Museums through Interactive Experiences. Heritage, 5(3):1370–1394.
Steuer, J. (1992). Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4):73–93.
Strzałkowski, P., Bęś, P., Szóstak, M., and Napiórkowski, M. (2024). Application of Virtual Reality (VR) Technology in Mining and Civil Engineering. Sustainability, 16(6):2239.
Sutcliffe, A. G. and Kaur, K. D. (2000). Evaluating the usability of virtual reality user interfaces. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(6):415–426.
Swan, J. and Gabbard, J. L. (2005). Survey of User-Based Experimentation in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings 1st International Conference on Virtual Reality, pages 1–9, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Mira Digital Publishing.
Touati, R., Fehmer, V., Ducret, M., Sailer, I., and Marchand, L. (2021). Augmented Reality in Esthetic Dentistry: a Case Report. Current Oral Health Reports, 8(2):23–28.
TV Brasil. (2017) “Especialista explica diferença entre rede social e mídia social (Mídia em Foco)”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press.
Veriscimo, E. D. S., Bernardes Junior, J. L., and Digiampietri, L. A. (2020). Evaluating User Experience in 3D Interaction: a Systematic Review. In XVI Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, pages 1–8, São Bernardo do Campo Brazil. ACM.
Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Futz Jäncke, Böcking, S., Schramm, H., Gysbers, A., Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., Laarni, J., Ravaja, N., Sacau, A., Baumgartner, T., and Jäncke, P. (2004). MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC-SPQ): Short Documentation and In structions for Application. Technical report, Hannover, Zurich, Porto, and Helsinki.
W3C Brasil. (2013). “Cartilha de Acessibilidade na Web: Fascículo I - Introdução”. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: 08 de dezembro de 2024.
Wachowski, L. and Wachowski, L. (1999). The Matrix. Translated title: Matrix IMDb ID: tt0133093 event-location: Estados Unidos da América, Austrália.
Wahlin, D.W. and Blomkamp, D. E. (2022). Making global local: Global methods, local planning, and the importance of genuine community engagement in australia. Policy Design and Practice, 5(4):483–503.
Wakkary, R., Oogjes, D., and Behzad, A. (2022). Two years or more of co-speculation: Polylogues of philosophers, designers, and a tilting bowl. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 29(5):1–44.
Weinert, C. (2019). Coping with the dark side of information technology - theoretical foundation and empirical evidence. Information Systems and Services.
Witmer, B. G. and Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3):225–240.
Zhang, T., Booth, R., Jean-Louis, R., Chan, R., Yeung, A., Gratzer, D., and Strudwick, G. (2020). A Primer on Usability Assessment Approaches for Health-Related Applications of Virtual Reality. JMIR Serious Games, 8(4):e18153.
Zhu, L., Chao, C., and Fu, Z. (2024). How hci integrates speculative thinking to envision futures. Journal of Futures Studies, 28(4).
