Minicursos do WebMedia 2026
Palavras-chave:
Acessibilidade Web, Computação Física, Gêmeos Digitais, Inteligência Artificial Generativa, Wikidata, Interação Humano-ComputadorSinopse
Tradicionalmente, o Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Multimídia e Web proporciona aos participantes a oportunidade de explorar e aprender sobre temas relevantes da área na trilha Minicursos e Tutoriais. Em sua 32a edição, realizada na cidade de Lavras, entre 27 e 30 de Outubro de 2026, o evento contou com 3 tutoriais e 5 minicursos, escolhidos em um processo de seleção das propostas enviadas em resposta a uma chamada pública de alcance nacional.
Assim como nas edições anteriores do WebMedia, os ministrantes dos minicursos foram convidados a produzir um texto correspondente ao conteúdo apresentado, para publicação na forma de capítulo de livro. Assim, este volume reúne, a posteriori, o material referente a três minicursos.
O Capítulo 1, intitulado “Avaliando Artefatos Digitais: Acessibilidade, Legibilidade e Comunicação Visual”, aborda a análise de elementos e propriedades recorrentes em diferentes artefatos digitais sob a ótica conjugada de acessibilidade, legibilidade e comunicação visual. Sob abordagem eminentemente prática, baseada na observação, comparação e reavaliação de diferentes exemplos, o capítulo discute como princípios e evidências podem ser utilizados para fundamentar decisões de análise e de projeto.
O Capítulo 2, intitulado ”Computação Física Inclusiva com micro:bit”, apresenta fundamentos e práticas de computação física inclusiva, delimitando o uso do micro:bit e da plataforma MakeCode para o desenvolvimento de soluções no ecossistema de Tecnologia Assistiva. Aliando conceitos de IHC voltada à acessibilidade e o Design Universal para a Aprendizagem, o capítulo guia a construção de protótipos com feedbacks multimodais (visuais, sonoros e táteis) e acionadores físicos adaptados.
O Capítulo 3, intitulado ”Gêmeos Digitais: Uma Ponte entre os Mundos Físico e Virtual”, fornece uma visão abrangente sobre gêmeos digitais, representações virtuais dinâmicas de entidades, processos e sistemas do mundo real, cobrindo conceitos fundamentais, paradigmas habilitadores, padrões e plataformas. O capítulo discute o papel das tecnologias multimídia e Web, explora domínios de aplicação e desafios para a construção de ecossistemas interoperáveis, confiáveis e seguros.
O Capítulo 4, intitulado “Personas e Acessibilidade Web: Desenvolvendo para Diferentes Usuários”, apresenta fundamentos teóricos e práticos de acessibilidade web, incluindo as diretrizes WCAG, HTML semântico, atributos ARIA e tecnologias assistivas. O capítulo promove uma visão crítica: a conformidade técnica, por si só, não garante uma experiência verdadeiramente acessível e propõe a criação de personas para fomentar empatia e uma perspectiva mais inclusiva no desenvolvimento.
O Capítulo 5, intitulado”Wikidata in the Era of Generative AI: Interfaces, Techniques, and Applications”, introduz o Wikidata, a versão em grafo de conhecimento da Wikipédia, com ênfase em interfaces e técnicas para construir aplicações de IA generativa. O capítulo apresenta iniciativas recentes como o Wikidata Embedding Project e o Wikidata Model Context Protocol (MCP), ilustrando conceitos como vinculação de entidades (grounding) e RAG por meio de um agente de checagem de fatos e um sistema de perguntas e respostas.
Capítulos
-
1. Avaliando Artefatos Digitais: Acessibilidade, Legibilidade e Comunicação Visual
-
2. Computação Física Inclusiva com Micro:bit
-
3. Gêmeos Digitais: Uma Ponte entre os Mundos Físico e Virtual
-
4. Personas e Acessibilidade Web: Desenvolvendo para Diferentes Usuários
-
5. Wikidata in the Era of Generative AI: Interfaces, Techniques, and Applications
Downloads
Referências
ABNT (2025) “NBR 17225: Acessibilidade em conteúdos e aplicações web”, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro.
Acharya, S., Khan, A. A., and Päivärinta, T. (2024). Interoperability levels and challenges of digital twins in cyber–physical systems. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 42.
Adam, D. and Kliegr, T. (2025). Traceable llm-based validation of statements in knowledge graphs. Information Processing & Management, 62(4):104128.
Adolphsen, M. (2025). Digital twin technology: Revolutionizing stadium management for the ultimate fan experience. [link].
Almeida, A., Batista, T., Cavalcante, E., Delicato, F., Motta, R., and Vieira, M. (2023). Middleware for digital twins: A systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Middleware for Digital Twin, pages 19–24, USA. ACM.
Almeida, A., Pereira, L., Batista, T., Cavalcante, E., Delicato, F. C., and Motta, R. (2026). Construção de sistemas de gêmeos digitais: Uma abordagem baseada em middleware. In Sampaio, L. N., Freitas, A. E. S., Munaretto, A., Moraes, I. M., and Mansilha, R. B., editors, Minicursos do SBRC 2026, pages 210–245. SBC, Brasil.
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. DOI: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Angelaki, S., Triantafyllidis, G. A., Besenecker, U. (2022). Lighting in Kindergartens: Towards Innovative Design Concepts for Lighting Design in Kindergartens Based on Childrens Perception of Space. Sustainability, 14(4), 2370. DOI: 10.3390/su14042370.
Angles, R. (2012). A comparison of current graph database models. In 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops, pages 171–177. IEEE.
Anthropic (2024). Introducing the model context protocol. [link]. Accessed: 2026-08-27.
Apple (2026) “Manuel de Uso do VoiceOver”, Apple, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
Axe DevTools (2026) “Axe DevTools - The ultimate digital accessibility testing solution”, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
axes4 (2026). PAC: PDF Accessibility Checker. [link]. Acesso em: 10 set. 2026.
Barricelli, B. R. and Fogli, D. (2022). Digital twins in human-computer interaction: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2):79–97.
Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E., and Fogli, D. (2019). A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE Access, 146.
BENNETT, C. L.; ROSNER, D. K. (2019) “The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the ‘Other”’, In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), ACM, New York, Paper 298. DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300528
BERNERS-LEE, T. (1999) “Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor”, HarperSanFrancisco.
Bersch, R. (2017) “Introdução à Tecnologia Assistiva”, CVI-Compreender Centro de Acessibilidade Assistiva, Porto Alegre, RS.
BILLESTRUP, J.; STAGE, J.; BRUUN, A.; NIELSEN, L.; NIELSEN, K. S. (2014) “Creating and Using Personas in Software Development: Experiences from Practice”, In: Sauer, S., Bogdan, C., Forbrig, P., Bernhaupt, R., Winckler, M. (eds) Human-Centered Software Engineering. HCSE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8742), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44811-316
Biswas, P., Kim, T. M., and Kim, W. S. (2026). Integration of digital twins and physical AI in cyber-physical systems. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 30.
Bokhtiar Al Zami, M., Shaon, S., Quy, V. K., and Nguyen, D. C. (2025). Digital twin in industries: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 13:47291–47336.
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., and Weston, J. (2015). Large-scale simple question answering with memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02075.
BRASIL (2000) “Lei nº 10.098, de 19 de dezembro de 2000”, Diário Oficial da União, Brasília.
BRASIL (2004) “Decreto nº 5.296, de 2 de dezembro de 2004”, Diário Oficial da União, Brasília.
BRASIL (2009) “Decreto nº 6.949, de 25 de agosto de 2009”, Diário Oficial da União, Brasília.
BRASIL (2012) “Decreto nº 7.724, de 16 de maio de 2012”, Diário Oficial da União, Brasília.
BRASIL (2015) “Lei nº 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015 (Lei Brasileira de Inclusão)”, Diário Oficial da União, Brasília.
Brasil, Departamento de GovernoEletrônico (2014). eMAG: Modelo de Acessibilidade em Governo [link]. Acesso em: 19 set. 2026.
BRASIL. (2004) Decreto nž 5.296, de 2 de dezembro de 2004. Regulamenta as Leis nž 10.048, de 8 de novembro de 2000, que dá prioridade de atendimento às pessoas que especifica, e nž 10.098, de 19 de dezembro de 2000, que estabelece normas gerais e critérios básicos para a promoção da acessibilidade. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF.
BRASIL. (2021) Decreto nž 10.645, de 11 de março de 2021. Regulamenta o art. 75 da Lei nž 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015, para instituir o Plano Nacional de Tecnologia Assistiva. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF.
BRASIL. (2021) Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Básica. Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático (PNLD). Brasília, DF: FNDE/MEC. Disponível em: [link].
BRASIL. (2022) Ministério da Educação. Computação na Educação Básica: Complemento à BNCC. Brasília, DF: MEC.
BRASIL. (2023) Lei n◦14.533, de 11 de janeiro de 2023. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República.
BRASIL. Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão (2014) “Modelo de Acessibilidade em Governo Eletrônico (eMAG), versão 3.1”, Departamento de Governo Eletrônico, Brasília.
BRITTO, T. C. P.; PIZZOLATO, E. B. (2016) “GAIA: uma proposta de um guia de recomendações de acessibilidade de interfaces Web com foco em aspectos do Autismo”, Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, v. 26, n. 2, p. 102–123.
Brooke, J. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P. W.; Thomas, B.; Weerdmeester, B. A.; Mcclelland, I. L. (eds.). Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis, 1996. p. 189194.
Bynion, T. M., Feldner, M. T. (2017). Self-assessment manikin. In V. Zeigler-Hill, T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–3). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_77-1
CALDWELL, B.; COOPER, M.; GUARINO REID, L.; VANDERHEIDEN, G. (2008) “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0”, W3C Recommendation, 11 December, [link], acesso em: 3 set. 2026.
Campos, J. P. P., Machado, M., Lima, G., and da Silva, V. T. (2025). Uma ferramenta web baseada em llms para respostas a perguntas simples sobre bases de conhecimento heterogêneas. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Multimídia e Web (WebMedia), pages 159–162. SBC.
CARLSON, L. “Review: Guidelines are only half of the story”, WCAG Working Group Wiki, W3C, [link], acesso em: 2 set. 2026.
Carothers, G. and Prud’hommeaux, E. (2014). RDF 1.1 Turtle. W3c recommendation, W3C. [link].
Cavalcante, E., Batista, T., and Oquendo, F. (2025). Exploring synergies and challenges of system-of-systems digital twins. In 2025 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Architecture Companion, pages 190–196, USA. IEEE.
Cespedes-Cubides, A. S. and Jradi, M. (2024). A review of building digital twins to improve energy efficiency in the building operational stage. Energy Informatics, 7(1).
Chen, H., Shen, X., Lv, Q.,Wang, J., Ni, X., and Ye, J. (2024). SAC-KG: Exploiting Large Language Models as Skilled Automatic Constructors for Domain Knowledge Graph. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4345–4360.
Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., Cheng, J., Zhao, X., and Duan, Z. (2020). Knowledge graph completion: A review. IEEE Access, 8:192435–192456.
Chepurova, A., Bulatov, A., Burtsev, M., and Kuratov, Y. (2026). Wikontic: Constructing wikidata-aligned, ontology-aware knowledge graphs with large language models. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8304–8319.
Chepurova, A., Kuratov, Y., Bulatov, A., and Burtsev, M. (2024). Prompt me one more time: A two-step knowledge extraction pipeline with ontologybased verification. In Proceedings of TextGraphs-17: Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing, pages 61–77.
Chiaro, D., Qi, P., Pescapè, A., and Piccialli, F. (2025). Generative AI-empowered digital twin: A comprehensive survey with taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 21(6):4287–4295.
CHISHOLM, W.; VANDERHEIDEN, G.; JACOBS, I. (1999) “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 1.0”, W3C Recommendation, 5 May, [link], acesso em: 3 set. 2026.
Consortium, T. U. (2025). Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Research, 53(D1):D609–D617.
COOPER, A. (1999) The Inmates Are Running the Asylum, Macmillan Publishing, Indianapolis.
Cormack, G.V., Clarke, C. L. A., and Büttcher, S. (2009). Reciprocal rank fusion outperforms condorcet and individual rank learning methods. In Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 758–759. ACM.
CUP (2026). Gestalt. Cambridge Dictionary, Cambridge University Press & Assessment. Acesso em: 20 set. 2026.
Deng, T., Zhang, K., and Shen, Z.-J. M. (2021). A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6(2):125–134.
DEQUE SYSTEMS (2021) “The Automated Accessibility Coverage Report”, [link], acesso em: 2 set. 2026.
Digital Twin Consortium (2022). The DTC Glossary. [link].
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D., and Beale, R. (2004).Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, 3 ed.
do Amaral, J., dos Santos, C., Montevechi, J., and de Queiroz, A. (2023). Energy digital twin applications: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 188.
dos Santos, C. H., de Queiroz, J. A., Leal, F., and Montevechi, J. A. B. (2020). Use of simulation in the industry 4.0 context: Creation of a digital twin to optimise decision making on non-automated process. Journal of Simulation, 16(3):284–297.
EDWARDS, E. J.; SUM, C. M.; BRANHAM, S. M. (2020) “Three Tensions Between Personas and Complex Disability Identities”, In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20), ACM, New York, p. 1–9. DOI: 10.1145/3334480.3382931
Ellis, W. D., editor (1938). A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. Routledge& Kegan Paul, London. Disponível no Internet Archive. Acesso em: 19 set. 2026.
Eramo, R., Bordeleau, F., Combemale, B., van den Brand, M., Wimmer, M., and Wortmann, A. (2022). Conceptualizing digital twins. IEEE Software, 39(2):39–46.
Errandonea, I., Beltrán, S., and Arrizabalaga, S. (2020). Digital twin for maintenance: A literature review. Computers in Industry, 123.
Ferranti, N., De Souza, J. F., Ahmetaj, S., and Polleres, A. (2024). Formalizing and validatingWikidata’s property constraints using SHACL and SPARQL. Semantic Web, 15(6):2333–2380.
Ferré-Bigorra, J., Casals, M., and Gangolells, M. (2022). The adoption of urban digital twins. Cities, 131.
Fischer, U. (2026). [PAC] table header scope is not recognized. LaTeXProject, GitHub Discussions, 24 abr. 2026.
Fitzgerald, J., Gomes, C., and Larsen, P. G. (2024). The engineering of digital twins. Springer Cham, Switzerland.
Frechette, S., Shao, G., and Pease, M. (2026). Digital TwinsWorkshops Summary Report. Technical Report NISTIR 8620, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA.
Freitas, M. L. P. de, Pires, F., Pessoa, M. (2025). Uso de Computação Física para desenvolvimento de Pensamento Computacional: um estudo de caso. In Anais do XXXI Workshop de Informática na Escola (pp. 475487). Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC). DOI: 10.5753/wie.2025.13490.
Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., and Barlow, C. (2020). Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 8:108952–108971.
Gao, Y., Qian, S., Li, Z., Wang, P., Wang, F., and He, Q. (2021). Digital twin and its application in transportation infrastructure. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence, pages 298–301, USA. IEEE.
Ghenai, C., Husein, L. A., Nahlawi, M. A., Hamid, A. K., and Bettayeb, M. (2022). Recent trends of digital twin technologies in the energy sector: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 54.
Gleason, C. (2020). Accessible User-Generated Social Media for Peoplewith Vision Impairments. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
Göbel, S. (2018). How Culturally Predominant Reading Directionand Number Word Construction Influence Numerical Cognition and MathematicsPerformance. In Language and Culture in Mathematical Cognition, pp 229–256. AP.
Google Developers (2024) “Learn HTML: Semantic HTML”, Google, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
Gordon, K. (2020). 5 principles of visual design in [link]. Nielsen Norman Group.
GOVERNMENT DIGITAL SERVICE (GDS) (2018) “Accessibility tools audit results”, GDS Accessibility Team, United Kingdom, [link], acesso em: 3 set. 2026.
Grieves, M. and Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Kahlen, F.-J., Flumerfelt, S., and Alves, A., editors, Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems: New findings and approaches, pages 85–113. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
Harris, S. and Seaborne, A. (2013). SPARQL 1.1 query language. W3c recommendation, W3C. [link].
Hayes, P. and Patel-Schneider, P. (2014). RDF 1.1 semantics. Recommendation, W3C. [link].
Heindorf, S., Potthast, M., Stein, B., and Engels, G. (2016). Vandalism detection inWikidata. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), pages 327–336. ACM.
HEITMEIER, K.-A.; KERSKEN, V.; PISKOREK, P.; BÖHM, A.-K.; EGGER, N.; LANG, M.; ZIMMERMANN, G. (2023) “Persona Co-Design for Improving Digital Accessibility”, In: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’23), ACM, New York, Article 227, 7 p. DOI: 10.1145/3544549.3585857
Heluany, J. B. and Gkioulos, V. (2023). A review on digital twins for power generation and distribution. International Journal of Information Security, 23(2):1171–1195.
Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., and Rudolph, S. (2010). Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies. Chapman & Hall.
Humberto A. P. Zanetti e Marcos A. F. Borges. (2020) Ensino de Programação utilizando Computação Física: uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura. Comunicações em Informática, v. 4, n. 1, p. 19–22. ISSN 2595-0622. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2595-0622.2020v4n1.52065.
Ibrahim, N., Aboulela, S., Ibrahim, A., and Kashef, R. (2024). A survey on augmenting knowledge graphs (KGs) with large language models (LLMs): models, evaluation metrics, benchmarks, and challenges. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1):76.
IDTA (2026). Specification of the Asset Administration Shell – Part 1: Metamodel, Version 3.2. Industrial Digital Twin Association. [link].
IEC (2023). IEC 63278-1:2023: Asset Administration Shell for industrial applications – Part 1: Asset Administration Shell structure.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE) (2023) “Pessoas com deficiência têm menor acesso à educação, ao trabalho e à renda”, Agência de Notícias, 7 jul., [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
ISO (2021). ISO 23247-1:2021: Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing. Part 1: Overview and general principles. [link].
ISO (2023). ISO/IEC 30173:2023: Digital twin – Concepts and terminology. [link].
JANSEN, B. J.; JUNG, S.-G; NIELSEN, L.; GUAN, K. W.; SALMINEN, J. (2022) “How to Create Personas: Three Persona Creation Methodologies with Implications for Practical Employment”, Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, v. 14, n. 3, p. 1–28
JANSEN, B. J.; JUNG, S.-G; NIELSEN, L.; GUAN, K. W.; SALMINEN, J. (2022) “How to Create Personas: Three Persona Creation Methodologies with Implications for Practical Employment”, Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, v. 14, n. 3, p. 1–28
Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., and Yu, P. S. (2021). A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 33(2):494–514.
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., and Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12):1–38.
Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., and Hicks, B. (2020). Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29:36–52.
Kannoth, S., Hermann, J., Damm, M., Rübel, P., Rusin, D., Jacobi, M., Mittelsdorf, B., Kuhn, T., and Antonino, P. O. (2021). Enabling SMEs to Industry 4.0 using the BaSyx Middleware: A case study. In Biffl, S., Navarro, E., Löwe, W., Sirjani, M., Mirandola, R., and Weyns, D., editors, Software Architecture, volume 12857 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 277–294. Springer Cham, Switzerland.
Karabulut, E., Pileggi, S. F., Groth, P., and Degeler, V. (2024). Ontologies in digital twins: A systematic literature review. Future Generation Computer Systems, 153:442–456.
Katsoulakis, E., Wang, Q., Wu, H., Shahriyari, L., Fletcher, R., Liu, J., Achenie, L., Liu, H., Jackson, P., Xiao, Y., Syeda-Mahmood, T., Tuli, R., and Deng, J. (2024). Digital twins for health: a scoping review. npj Digital Medicine, 7(1).
Kellogg, G., Hartig, O., Champin, P.-A., and Seaborne, A. (2026). RDF 1.2 concepts and abstract data model. [link]. Publicado em 7 abr. 2026. Versão desta data: [link]. A Recomendação vigente continua sendo RDF 1.1. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2026.
Kherbache, M., Maimour, M., and Rondeau, E. (2022). Digital twin network for the IIoT using Eclipse Ditto and Hono. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(8):37–42.
Kim, S., Chen, J., Cheng, T., Gindulyte, A., He, J., He, S., Li, Q., Shoemaker, B. A., Thiessen, P. A., Yu, B., Zaslavsky, L., Zhang, J., and Bolton, E. E. (2023). Pubchem 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(D1):D1373–D1380.
KIRKPATRICK, A.; O CONNOR, J.; CAMPBELL, A.; COOPER, M. (2018) “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1”, W3C Recommendation, 5 June, [link], acesso em: 3 set. 2026.
KIRKPATRICK, A.; O CONNOR, J.; CAMPBELL, A.; COOPER, M. (2023) “Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2”, W3C Recommendation, 5 October, [link], acesso em: 3 set. 2026.
Koegel, R., Kim, S., Koegel, L., & Schwartz, B. (2013). Improving Socialization for High School Students with ASD by Using Their Preferred Interests. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 2121–2134. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-013-1765-3
Kreuzer, T., Papapetrou, P., and Zdravkovic, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in digital twins – a systematic literature review. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 151.
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., and Sihn, W. (2018). Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11):1016–1022.
Krug, S. (2014). Don’t Make Me Think, Revisited: A Common SenseApproach to Web and Mobile Usability. New Riders, 3 ed.
Kuši´c, K., Schumann, R., and Ivanjko, E. (2023). A digital twin in transportation: Real-time synergy of traffic data streams and simulation for virtualizing motorway dynamics. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 55.
Lavrinovics, E., Biswas, R., Bjerva, J., and Hose, K. (2025). Knowledge graphs, large language models, and hallucinations: An NLP perspective. Journal of Web Semantics, 85:100844.
Lehmann, J., Isele, R., Jakob, M., Jentzsch, A., Kontokostas, D., Mendes, P. N., Hellmann, S., Morsey, M., van Kleef, P., Auer, S., and Bizer, C. (2015). Dbpedia – a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia. Semantic Web, 6(2):167–195.
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-t., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., and Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 9459–9474.
Li, D., Liang, Y., Qian, S., Wu, H., Jia, W., Fu, Y., and Sun, Y. (2025a). A review of background, methods, limitations and opportunities of knowledge graph completion. Computer Science Review, 58:100809.
Li, M., Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Li, S., Xie, W., Ng, S. K., Chua, T.-S., and Deng, Y. (2025b). Knowledge boundary of large language models: A survey. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 5131–5157.
Li, T., Long, Q., Chai, H., Zhang, S., Jiang, F., Liu, H., Huang, W., Jin, D., and Li, Y. (2025). Generative AI empowered network digital twins: Architecture, technologies, and applications. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(6).
Li, Y., Huang, Y., Qi, G., Feng, J., Hu, N., Zhai, S., Xue, H., Chen, Y., Shen, R., and Wu, T. (2025c). Harnessing diverse perspectives: A multi-agent framework for enhanced error detection in knowledge graphs. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2025), Part VI, volume 15991 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 446–458. Springer.
Li, Y., Li, Z., Duan, Y., and Spulber, A.-B. (2023). Physical Artificial Intelligence (PAI): The next-generation Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 24(8):1231–1238.
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., and Butler, J. (2023). Universal Principlesof Design. Rockport Publishers, 3 ed.
Lighthouse (2026) “Introduction to Lighthouse”, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
Lima, G., Rodrigues, J., Machado, M., Soares, E., Fiorini, S. R., Thiago, R., Azevedo, L. G., da Silva, V. T., and Cerqueira, R. (2024). KIF: A Wikidata-Based Framework for Integrating Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10304.
Liu, X., Liu, Y., and Hu,W. (2024). Knowledge graph error detection with contrastive confidence adaption. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 8824–8831.
Lu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, K. I.-K., Huang, H., and Xu, X. (2020). Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 61.
Machado, M. d. O. C., Porto Campos, J. P., Lima, G. A. F., and Silva, V. T. d. (2025). KIF-QA: Using Off-the-Shelf LLMs to Answer Simple Questions over Heterogeneous Knowledge Bases. In Proceedings of the 5th Wikidata Workshop, volume 4108 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org.
Machado, M. d. O. C., Rodrigues, J. M. B., Lima, G., and da Silva, V. T. (2024a). LLM Store: A KIF Plugin for Wikidata-Based Knowledge Base Completion via LLMs. In KBC-LM/LM-KBC@ ISWC.
Machado, M. d. O. C., Rodrigues, J. M. B., Lima, G., and Silva, V. T. d. (2024b). LLM Store: A KIF Plugin for Wikidata-Based Knowledge Base Completion via LLMs. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Knowledge Base Construction from Texts: The LM-KBC Challenge @ ISWC 2024, volume 3853 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org.
MAKATI, T.; TIGWELL, G. W.; SHINOHARA, K. (2024) “The Promise and Pitfalls of Web Accessibility Overlays for Blind and Low Vision Users”, In: Proceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’24), ACM, New York, Article 38, 12 p. DOI: 10.1145/3663548.3675650
MDN Glossary (2026) “Accessibility tree”, Mozilla Developer Network, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
MDN Web Docs (2023) “Document Object Model (DOM)”, Mozilla Developer Network, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
MDN Web Docs (2024) “Referência de elementos HTML”, Mozilla, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
MDN Web Docs (2024) “Semântica – Glossário do MDN Web Docs”, Mozilla, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
Micro:bit Educational Foundation, “Micro:bit impact report and educational resources,” 2020. [Online]. Available: [link]
Molly Follette Story, James L. Mueller e Ronald L. Mace. (1998) The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. Edição revista. Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. ERIC ED 460 554.
MORO, P.; HENRIQUES, M. (2025) “Falta de acessibilidade digital ainda é desafio para pessoas com deficiência: pesquisa da UFSM investiga consequências da falta de acessibilidade em veículos de comunicação”, Agência de Notícias UFSM, 7 ago., [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
Mousavi, S. M., Alghisi, S., and Riccardi, G. (2026). LLMs as Repositories of Factual Knowledge: Limitations and Solutions. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 34:2213–2226.
Nardi, C. C. d. S. (2021). Diretrizes para Produção de Alternativasao Conteúdo Visual em Mídias Sociais Online sob a Perspectiva de Pessoas comDeficiência Visual. PhD thesis, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.
NARIO-REDMOND, M. R.; GOSPODINOV, D.; COBB, A. (2017) “Crip for a Day: The Unintended Negative Consequences of Disability Simulations”, Rehabilitation Psychology, v. 62, n. 3, p. 324–333. DOI: 10.1037/rep0000127
Navigli, R., Conia, S., and Ross, B. (2023). Biases in Large Language Models: Origins, Inventory, and Discussion. J. Data and Information Quality, 15(2).
NEATE, T.; BOURAZERI, A.; ROPER, A.; STUMPF, S.; WILSON, S. (2019) “Co-Created Personas: Engaging and Empowering Users with Diverse Needs Within the Design Process”, In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), ACM, New York, p. 1–12. DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300880
Nele, L., Mattera, G., Yap, E. W., Vozza, M., and Vespoli, S. (2024). Towards the application of machine learning in digital twin technology: a multi-scale review. Discover Applied Sciences, 6(10).
Norouzi, S. S. and Hitzler, P. (2025). Knowledge-Enhanced Geospatial QA: Integrating Wikidata Fact Verification with LLMs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, volume 5, pages 334–339.
NV Access (2023) “About NVDA”, NV Access, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
Odell, J., Lemus-Rojas, M., and Brys, L. (2022). Wikidata for Scholarly Communication Librarianship. IUPUI University Library. DOI: 10.7912/9Z4E-9M13.
PDFA (2023). Tagged PDF Best Practice Guide: [link]. Originally publishedin 2019; updated July 26, 2023.
Peng, Y., Bonald, T., and Alam, M. (2024). Refining Wikidata taxonomy using large language models. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). ACM.
PETRIE, H.; KHEIR, O. (2007) “The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites”, In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07), ACM, New York, p. 397–406. DOI: 10.1145/1240624.1240688
POEU (acesso em setembro de 2026). Testing Publications with NVDA:PDFs. [link].
POWER, C.; FREIRE, A. P.; PETRIE, H.; SWALLOW, D. (2012) “Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web”, In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’12), ACM, New York, p. 433–442. DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2207736
PRUITT, J.; GRUDIN, J. (2003) “Personas: practice and theory”, In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (DUX ’03), ACM, New York, p. 1–15.
Purcell, W. and Neubauer, T. (2023). Digital twins in agriculture: A state-of-the-art review. Smart Agricultural Technology, 3.
Pylianidis, C., Osinga, S., and Athanasiadis, I. N. (2021). Introducing digital twins to agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 184.
Razzaque, M. A., Milojevic-Jevric, M., Palade, A., and Clarke, S. (2016). Middleware for Internet of Things: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(1):70–95.
Regino, A. G. and dos Reis, J. C. (2025). Can LLMs be knowledge graph curators for validating triple insertions? In Proceedings of the Workshop on Generative AI and Knowledge Graphs (GenAIK), pages 87–99, Abu Dhabi, UAE. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.
Rico, M., Taverna, M. L., Galli, M. R., and Caliusco, M. L. (2023). Context-aware representation of digital twins’ data: The ontology network role. Computers in Industry, 7:167653–167671.
Rivera, L. F., Jimenez, M., Villegas, N. M., Tamura, G., and Muller, H. A. (2022). The forging of autonomic and cooperating digital twins. IEEE Internet Computing, 26(5):41–49.
Robinson, I., Webber, J., and Eifrem, E. (2013). Graph Databases. O’Reilly.
RØMEN, D.; SVANÆS, D. (2012) “Validating WCAG versions 1.0 and 2.0 through usability testing with disabled users”, Universal Access in the Information Society, v. 11, n. 4, p. 375–385. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-011-0259-3
Sáez, T. and Hogan, A. (2018). Automatically generating wikipedia info-boxes from wikidata. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, WWW ’18, page 1823–1830, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
SCHULZ, T.; FUGLERUD, K. S. (2012) “Creating Personas with Disabilities”, In: Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2012), LNCS 7383, Springer, Berlin, p. 145–152. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31534-3_22
SECTION508.GOV “Sample Personas for Users With Disabilities”, U.S. General Services Administration, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
Shao, G., Hightower, J., and Schindel, W. (2023). Credibility consideration for digital twins in manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 35:24–28.
Sharma, A., Kosasih, E., Zhang, J., Brintrup, A., and Calinescu, A. (2022). Digital twins: State of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 30.
Sun, T., He, X., and Li, Z. (2023). Digital twin in healthcare: Recent updates and challenges. Digital Health, 9.
Tan, B. and Matta, A. (2023). The digital twin synchronization problem: Framework, formulations, and analysis. IISE Transactions, 56(6):652–665.
TANG, X.; PIPER, A. M. (2026) “Designing for Collective Access: In Search of a Solution to Accessible Communication in a Mixed-Ability Non-Profit”, In: Proceedings of the 2026 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’26), ACM, New York, p. 4400–4415. DOI: 10.1145/3800645.3813075
Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., and Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4):2405–2415.
Tecassistiva (2026) “Jaws Screen Reader”, Tecassistiva, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
Toutsop, O., Kornegay, K., and Smith, E. (2021). A comparative analyses of current IoT middleware platforms. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud, pages 413–420, USA. IEEE.
UNITED STATES CONGRESS (1998) “Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act”, 29 U.S.C. § 794d, Washington, D.C.
veraPDF (2026). veraPDF REST Client, veraPDF Consortium. [link]. Acesso em: 29 set. 2026.
Verborgh, R., Vander Sande, M., Colpaert, P., Coppens, S., Mannens, E., and Van de Walle, R. (2014). Web-scale querying through Linked Data Fragments. In Bizer, C., Heath, T., Auer, S., and Berners-Lee, T., editors, Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, volume 1184 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR.
Verborgh, R., Vander Sande, M., Hartig, O., Van Herwegen, J., De Vocht, L., De Meester, B., Haesendonck, G., and Colpaert, P. (2016). Triple pattern fragments: A low-cost knowledge graph interface for the web. Journal ofWeb Semantics, 37-38:184–206.
Vispero (2026) “ZoomText Screen Magnification”, Vispero, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
VLibras (2023) “Suíte VLibras”, Governo do Brasil, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
Voas, J., Mell, P., Laplante, P., and Piroumian, V. (2025). Security and ttust considerations for digital twin technology. Technical Report NIST IR 8356, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA.
Vrandečić, D. and Krötzsch, M. (2014). Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM, 57(10):78–85.
W3C (1997) “Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)”, World Wide Web Consortium, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
W3C (2018) “Understanding Success Criterion 1.3.6: Identify Purpose”, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
W3C (2018) “Understanding Success Criterion 2.2.6: Timeouts”, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
W3C (2021) “Making Content Usable for People with Cognitive and Learning Disabilities”, W3C Group Note, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
W3C (2023) “Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.2”,World Wide Web Consortium, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
W3C (2023) “Understanding Success Criterion 1.3.5: Identify Input Purpose”, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
W3C (2024) “ARIA Authoring Practices Guide (APG)”, World Wide Web Consortium, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
W3C (2024) “HTML Specification: Semantics, structure, and APIs of HTML documents”, World Wide Web Consortium, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
W3C (2024). World Wide Web Consortium, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. [link]. W3CRecommendation, 12 December 2024. Acesso em: 19 set. 2026.
W3C (2025) “Explainer for W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0”, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
W3C (2026). Complex Images, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), WorldWide Web Consortium. [link].
W3C COGA TASK FORCE “COGA FAQ”, Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
W3C OWL WG (2012). OWL 2 Web Ontology Language document overview (second edition). Recommendation, W3C. [link].
Wang, L. (2024). Digital twins in agriculture: A review of recent progress and open issues. Electronics, 13(11).
WAVE (2026) “WAVE web accessibility evaluation tool”, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
WEBAIM (2021) “Survey of Web Accessibility Practitioners #3”, [link], acesso em: 2 set. 2026.
WEBAIM (2024) “Screen Reader User Survey”, [link], acesso em: 5 set. 2026.
WEBAIM (2026) “The WebAIM Million: An Annual Accessibility Analysis of the Top 1,000,000 Home Pages”, [link], acesso em: 4 set. 2026.
Weil, C., Bibri, S. E., Longchamp, R., Golay, F., and Alahi, A. (2023). Urban digital twin challenges: A systematic review and perspectives for sustainable smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99.
White, K., Abou-Zahra, S., and Henry, S. L. (2026). Planning andManaging Web Accessibility. Atualizado 12/08/2026. Acesso em: 19 set. 2026.
Wikidata (2026a). Wikidata:Data access. [link]. Revisão 2497420605. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2026.
Wikidata (2026b). Wikidata:Database download. [link]. Revisão 2479770906. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2026.
Wikidata Community (2026). Wikidata: Mcp. [link]. Accessed: 2026-08-27.
Wikimedia Deutschland (2025). Wikidata embedding project. [link]. Accessed: 2026-08-27.
Wikimedia Deutschland (2026). Wikidata vector database. [link]. Accessed: 2026-08-27.
Williams, R. (2015). The Non-Designer’s Design Book. Peachpit, 4 ed. 40
Wood, D., Lanthaler, M., and Cyganiak, R. (2014). RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax. W3c recommendation, W3C. [link].
Wooley, A., Silva, D. F., and Bitencourt, J. (2023). When is a simulation a digital twin? a systematic literature review. Manufacturing Letters, 35:940–951.
Wu, D., Zheng, A., Yu, W., Cao, H., Ling, Q., Liu, J., and Zhou, D. (2025). Digital twin technology in transportation infrastructure: A comprehensive survey of current applications, challenges, and future directions. Applied Sciences, 15(4).
Wu, E.-H., Liu, Y.-Q., Xu, T.-C., Ren, L.-X., Qin, Y.-M., Wei, M.-Y., He, X.-W., Yuan, D.-Y., Hou, W.-C., Ma, Z.-W., and Sheng, B. (2026). Physical AI: Evolution, progress, challenges, and prospects. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 41(1):271–288.
Youssef, P., Koraş, O., Li, M., Schlötterer, J., and Seifert, C. (2023). Give me the facts! a survey on factual knowledge probing in pre-trained language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 15588–15605.
Zerbato, A. P., Mendes, E. G. (2018). Desenho universal para a aprendizagem como estratégia de inclusão escolar. Educação Unisinos, 22(2), 147–155.
Zhang, B. and Soh, H. (2024). Extract, define, canonicalize: An llm-based framework for knowledge graph construction. In Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 9820–9836. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Zhang, J., Ellwein, C., Heithoff, M., Michael, J., and Wortmann, A. (2025). Digital twin and the Asset Administration Shell: An analysis of the three types of AASs and their feasibility for Digital Twin Engineering. Software and Systems Modeling, 24(3):771–793.
Zhong, L., Wu, J., Li, Q., Peng, H., and Wu, X. (2023). A comprehensive survey on automatic knowledge graph construction. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(4):1–62.
Downloads
Data de publicação
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
