Livro de Minicursos do XXII Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais
Palavras-chave:
Integração Humano-Computador (HInt), Engenharia Semiótica, Análise Qualitativa em IHC, Ética em UX, Design Manipulativo, Padrões Justos de DesignSinopse
O Livro de Minicursos do XXII Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais reúne três dos quatro minicursos conduzidos durante o IHC 2023, em Maceió (AL).
No capítulo 1, as autoras apresentam o paradigma de Integração Humano-Computador (HInt), e uma extensão da teoria da Engenharia Semiótica para atender as demandas desse novo paradigma. O texto apresenta conceitos, tecnologias parceiras, um arcabouço teórico, demonstração e exercícios.
No capítulo 2, as autoras apresentam conteúdo para auxiliar pesquisadores e profissionais a realizar análise de dados qualitativos de forma sistematizada, visando aumentar o rigor dessa prática. O texto apresenta fundamentos, aplicações e exemplos, além de diferentes formas de visualização dos resultados.
No capítulo 3, os autores discutem questões de ética na Experiência do Usuário (UX) por meio da adoção de padrões justos de design. O texto apresenta um referencial conceitual, um conjunto de padrões justos de design, e descrevem a realização do minicurso. Como atividade prática durante o minicurso, houve a análise de um sistema de rede social. Os autores discutem os resultados desta análise no texto.
Espera-se que os conteúdos apresentados possam servir de referência para professores, pesquisadores e estudantes, além de apoiar ações da comunidade e incentivar outros especialistas a propor minicursos nos próximos congressos de IHC.
Capítulos
-
1. Introdução ao Paradigma da Integração Humano-Computador à luz da Engenharia Semiótica
-
2. Análise Qualitativa em IHC: da codificação à criação de visualizações
-
3. Ética em UX: Evitando o Design Manipulativo Através de Padrões Justos de Design
Downloads
Referências
Barbosa, G. A. R. (2024). Extensão da Interação para a Integração Humano-Computador à Luz da Teoria da Engenharia Semiótica. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Geral, Brasil.
Barbosa, G. A. R. e Prates, R. O. (2022). Extending the ontology, metacommunication and communicability of semiotic engineering to the emerging paradigm of human-computer integration (hint). In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC’22, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Barbosa, G. A. R. e Prates, R. O. (2023). Evoluir é preciso: Movendo da interação para a integração humano-computador. In Anais Estendidos do XXII Simpósio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais - Minicurso, pages 1–8, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.
Barbosa, G. A. R., da S. Fernandes, U., Santos, N. S., e Prates, R. O. (2023). Human-computer integration as an extension of interaction: Understanding its state-of-the-art and the next challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0):1–20.
Barbosa, G. A. R., Prates, R. O., da S. Fernandes, U., e Santos, N. S. (2021a). Extending interaction to human-computer integration: What do we already know and what do we need to explore? In Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC’21, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Barbosa, S. D. J. (1999). Programação via Interface. PhD thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Barbosa, S. D. J. e de Paula, M. G. (2003). Designing and evaluating interaction as conversation: a modeling language based on semiotic engineering. In Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification: 10th International Workshop, DSV-IS 2003, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal, June 11-13, 2003. Revised Papers 10, pages 16–33. Springer.
Barbosa, S. D. J., Barbosa, G. D. J., Souza, C. S. d., e Leitão, C. F. (2021b). A semiotics-based epistemic tool to reason about ethical issues in digital technology design and development. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’21, page 363–374, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Boldu, R., Dancu, A., Matthies, D. J., Buddhika, T., Siriwardhana, S., e Nanayakkara, S. (2018). Fingerreader2.0: Designing and evaluating a wearable finger-worn camera to assist people with visual impairments while shopping. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 2(3).
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., and Terry, G. (2019). Thematic Analysis, pages 843–860. Springer Singapore, Singapore.
Chagas, B. A., Redmiles, D. F., e de Souza, C. S. (2018). Observed appropriation of iot technology: A semiotic account. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC 2018, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Chagas, B. A., Redmiles, D. F., e de Souza, C. S. (2019). Signs of appropriation: A semiotic account of breakdowns with iot technology. Journal on Interactive Systems, 10(2):3–19.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage.
CREPAX, Tommaso; MÜHLBERG, Jan Tobias. Upgrading the protection of children from manipulative and addictive strategies in online games: Legal and technical solutions beyond privacy regulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09928, 2022.
da Silva, B. S. e Barbosa, S. D. J. (2007). Designing human-computer interaction with MoLIC diagrams–a practical guide. Technical Report 12/07, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro. ISSN: 0103-9741.
Data Viz (2024). Data Viz Project. [link]. Online; accessed 30 September 2023.
de Moura, M. A., Martinelli, S., and Zaina, L. (2024). Guiding the Adoption of UX Research Practices: An Approach to Support Software Professionals. pages 473–484.
de Souza, C. S. (2005). The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. MIT press.
de Souza, C. S. e Leitão, C. F. (2009). Semiotic engineering methods for scientific research in hci. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 2(1):1–122.
de Souza, C. S., Leitão, C. F., Prates, R. O., e da Silva, E. J. (2006). The semiotic inspection method. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC ’06, page 148–157, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Sage.
Dias, G. A., da, S. P. M., Delfino Jr., J. B., and Almeida, J. R. d. (2011). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): avaliando a aceitação tecnológica do Open Journal Systems (OJS). Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, 21(2).
Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, volume 398. Indiana University Press.
Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative report, 23(11).
Farooq, U. e Grudin, J. (2016). Human-computer integration. Interactions, 23(6):26–32.
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley.
Flick, U. (2008). Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa-3. Artmed editora.
Folmer, E. (2015). Interaction Design Patterns. Interaction Design Foundation. [link]. Online; accessed 29 January 2023.
Friese, S. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS. ti. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Friese, S. (2023). Relations: ATLAS.ti 9 Windows - User Manual. [link]. Online; accessed 30 September 2023.
Garcia, S. and Andujar, M. (2023). Ui design recommendations for multimodal xr interfaces using a collaborative system. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 3–14. Springer.
Garousi, V., Felderer, M., and Mäntylä, M. V. (2019). Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering. Information and software technology, 106:101–121.
Gibbs, G. (2009). Análise de dados qualitativos: coleção pesquisa qualitativa. Bookman Editora.
Hassenzahl, M. (2018). The Thing and I (Summer of ’17 Remix), pages 17–31. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Hecker, J. and Kalpokas, N. (2024). Thematic vs. Content Analysis. [link]. Online; accessed 05 July 2024.
Hoda, R. (2021). Socio-technical grounded theory for software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(10):3808–3832.
IBARRA, Maria Cristina. (2016) “O design e suas possíveis interações com práticas criativas desenvolvidas por não-designers.” In: Revista ARCOS design., p. 165. UERJ.
Larkin, M., Flowers, P., and Smith, J. A. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.
Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., and Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-1(1):4–11.
LUKOFF, K. et al. How the design of youtube influences user sense of agency. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021. p. 1-17.
Martinelli, S. (2019). MultiTACT: uma abordagem para a construção de atividades de ensino multidisciplinares para estimular o Pensamento Computacional no Ensino Fundamental I. Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) - Dissertação (Mestrado), pages 1–201. [link].
Martinelli, S. R. and Zaina, L. A. M. (2021). Learning hci from a virtual flipped classroom: improving the students’ experience in times of covid-19. In XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC ’21, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Martinelli, S., Lopes, L., and Zaina, L. (2022). Ux research in the software industry: an investigation of long-term ux practices. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC ’22’), New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
Maués, R. d. A. e Barbosa, S. D. J. (2013). Crosscommunicability: Evaluating the meta-communication of cross-platform applications. In Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., e Winckler, M., editors, Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, pages 241–258, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Maués, R. d. A. e Barbosa, S. D. J. (2014). Reflections on the cross-platform semiotic inspection method. In Kurosu, M., editor, Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools, pages 533–544, Cham. Springer International Publishing.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., and Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MONGE ROFFARELLO, Alberto; DE RUSSIS, Luigi. (2022) “Towards understanding the dark patterns that steal our attention”. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. p. 1-7.
Mueller, F. F., Lopes, P., Strohmeier, P., Ju, W., Seim, C., Weigel, M., Nanayakkara, S., Obrist, M., Li, Z., Delfa, J., Nishida, J., Gerber, E. M., Svanaes, D., Grudin, J., Greuter, S., Kunze, K., Erickson, T., Greenspan, S., Inami, M., Marshall, J., Reiterer, H., Wolf, K., Meyer, J., Schiphorst, T., Wang, D., e Maes, P. (2020). Next steps for human-computer integration. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, page 1–15, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Mueller, F., Maes, P., e Grudin, J. (2019). Human-Computer Integration (Dagstuhl Seminar 18322). Dagstuhl Reports, 8(8):18–47.
O GLOBO. “Número de usuários do Instagram ultrapassa 2 bilhões e se aproxima do Facebook”. 2022. Disponível em: [link].
Oliveira, E. R., Luz, L. C. S., e Prates, R. O. (2008). Aplicação semi-estruturada do método de inspeção semiótica: Estudo de caso para o domínio educacional. In Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC ’08, page 50–59, BRA. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação.
Peirce, C. S. P. e Peirce, C. S. (1992). The essential Peirce, volume 1: Selected philosophical writings?(1867–1893), volume 1. Indiana University Press.
POTEL-SAVILLE, Marie; DA ROCHA, Mathilde. From Dark Patterns to Fair Patterns? Usable Taxonomy to Contribute Solving the Issue with Countermeasures. In: Annual Privacy Forum. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. p. 145-165.
Prates, R. O. (1998). A Engenharia Semiótica de Linguagens de Interfaces Multi-Usuário. PhD thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Prates, R. O. (2017). An overview of semiotic engineering epistemic tools for the design of collaborative systems. Conversations Around Semiotic Engineering, pages 81–99.
Prates, R. O. e Barbosa, S. D. J. (2007). Introdução à teoria e prática da interação humano computador fundamentada na engenharia semiótica. Jornadas de Atualizações em informática, pages 263–326.
Prates, R. O., de Souza, C. S., e Barbosa, S. D. (2000). Methods and tools: a method for evaluating the communicability of user interfaces. interactions, 7(1):31–38.
RADESKY, Jenny et al. (2022) “Prevalence and characteristics of manipulative design in mobile applications used by children”. In: JAMA Network Open, v. 5, n. 6.
Richards, L. and Morse, J. M. (2012). README FIRST for a User s Guide to Qualitative Methods. Sage publications.
Rogers, Y. (2012). HCI theory: classical, modern, and contemporary, volume 14. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 1st edition.
Rosala, M. (2022). How to Analyze Qualitative Data from UX Research: Thematic Analysis. [link]. Online; accessed 20 August 2023.
Roto, V., Law, E.-C., Vermeeren, A. P., and Hoonhout, J. (2011). User experience white paper: Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience.
Runeson, P., Host, M., Rainer, A., and Regnell, B. (2012). Case study research in software engineering: Guidelines and examples. John Wiley & Sons.
Saad, J., Martinelli, S., Machado, L. S., de Souza, C. R. B., Alvaro, A., and Zaina, L. (2021). UX work in software startups: A thematic analysis of the literature. Information and Software Technology, 140:106688.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE publications Ltd.
SCHAFFNER, Brennan; LINGAREDDY, Neha A.; CHETTY, Marshini. (2022) “Understanding Account Deletion and Relevant Dark Patterns on Social Media”. In: ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, v. 6, n. CSCW2, p. 1-43.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
Schwabish, J. (2021). Better Data Visualizations: A Guide for Scholars, Researchers, and Wonks. Columbia University Press.
SciTePress – Science and Technology Publications.
Sharp, H., Dittrich, Y., and De Souza, C. R. (2016). The role of ethnographic studies in empirical software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 42(8):786–804.
SOUSA, Carla; OLIVEIRA, Ana. The Dark Side of Fun: Understanding Dark Patterns and Literacy Needs in Early Childhood Mobile Gaming. In: European Conference on Games Based Learning. 2023. p. 599-610.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Citeseer.
Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action research third edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
Teixeira, G. V. and Zaina, L. A. (2022). Using lean personas to the description of uxrelated requirements: A study with software startup professionals. In 24th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2022), pages 211–222.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Penso Editora.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
Zaina, L. A., Fortes, R. P., Casadei, V., Nozaki, L. S., and Paiva, D. M. B. (2022). Preventing accessibility barriers: Guidelines for using user interface design patterns in mobile applications. Journal of Systems and Software, 186:111213.
Zaina, L., Choma, J., Saad, J., Barroca, L., Sharp, H., Machado, L., and de Souza, C. R. B. (2023). What do software startups need from ux work? Empirical Software Engineering, 28(3).
Downloads
Data de publicação
Categorias
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
